Hacker News

Favorites Setup
Comment by Demiurge | original | Creepy Crawlies
[−]Demiurge · 2026-08-30 Sun 15:12 UTC · link
I maintain a formerly popular gaming website, and it used to have hundreds of legitimate requests per second. The load would be especially high during popular event times. So, it’s always been running on a dedicated server.

It also has an “online users” counter, which attempted to count real user sessions of unauthenticated user which still maintained a session, which lets them comment, or modify certain filter and display options. It never counted the Google bot.

Over the last few years this counter went from 100-200 users online to thousands. I have been very hands-off with it for many years, doing minor upgrades and backups. However, the site also has gotten quite slow, these sessions were obviously impacting it. So, I finally investigated these crawlers, and yes, it turns out it’s an insane amount of traffic that is entirely artificial, the site has just a handful of real users, and thousands of these crawling sessions that actually try to do everything they can, click every button. It doesn’t help that sort and search were implemented using GET links.

I fixed the counter to exclude the crawlers, but I have a bit of a dilemma. I don’t want to stop the bots from updating their knowledge based on all the content.

The best solution I could find is the new CloudFlare feature where they might charge the crawlers for every request, or otherwise block them. I think that’s a fantastic idea for the internet, at large. I signed up for the beta access, but haven’t heard from them again. I do think it’s unfortunate that this requires CloudFlare and the middleman.

Overall, it seems like the LLM are really straining the internet economy, the openness of it. Email spam used to be the worst, but the organized trillionaire labs sucking up the entire internet is going to break something if we don’t preempt them better.

It’s too bad the copyright and public internet systems are not acting quick enough. And I think there is no reason to act like this race really has to be at such a breakneck speed.

[−]andai · 2026-08-30 Sun 15:15 UTC · link
> And I think there is no reason to act like this race really has to be at such a breakneck speed.

I would promote this idea to all of my competitors. Nah mate, you don't have to ask her out right now. You can wait until next week ;)

Anyway, silver linings, looks like we're finally going to get widely adopted infra for microtransactions.

https://web.archive.org/web/20030202042510/http://www.openp2...

[−]rankdiff · 2026-08-30 Sun 15:18 UTC · link
What is "formally popular"?
[−]klez · 2026-08-30 Sun 15:23 UTC · link
From context I'd say they meant "formerly" and that's just a typo. I didn't even notice the error before you pointed it out.
[−]Demiurge · 2026-08-30 Sun 16:31 UTC · link
Yes, my bad! Typing on the terrible iPhone keyboard :)
[−]iririririr · 2026-08-30 Sun 16:07 UTC · link
do not fall for cloudflare marketing.

they have one of the worst bot detection in the industry. but because everyone uses them, their huge false positive numbers won't show up anywhere.

[−]TZubiri · 2026-08-30 Sun 16:40 UTC · link
There's a winner takes all (monopoly) dynamic, if everyone uses your product, you can share the ip banlists between customers.
[−]anal_reactor · 2026-08-30 Sun 16:12 UTC · link
> Overall, it seems like the LLM are really straining the internet economy, the openness of it

I feel like it's the same issue that public resources are facing.

Step 1: public resource is freely available

Step 2: asshole shows up, drains the resource completely just because they can

Step 3: either resource is taken away, or it has massive security behind it