Right, those are historical numbers, not design specs. I was asking for the design spec. Ie, in order to say whether it was “safe enough” the historical numbers either exceed the requirement spec (or not), like what exists for CCP.
There are multiple layers of risk consent, from engineering, safety, medical, and crew, for NASA. Of those, I think crew are the least likely to say no because they tend to come from a very risk tolerant population.
There are multiple layers of risk consent, from engineering, safety, medical, and crew, for NASA. Of those, I think crew are the least likely to say no because they tend to come from a very risk tolerant population.
Whatever official spec that did or did not exist is irrelevant.