> We're not locked in to a suicide pact with what the Founding Fathers decided back in the late 1700s. Congress can decide that all LLM-generated code is automatically covered by -say- the GPLv3, even if no one holds the copyright to it.
I have no issue with changing the law. My comment is about the article and the author's misapplication of the law.
I think it would be the part about how courts have a fairly strong status quo bias and aren't going to remake the entire economy overnight with completely unenforceable provisions.
What are they going to do confiscate the world's gamer GPUs that can run this stuff all locally?
I have no issue with changing the law. My comment is about the article and the author's misapplication of the law.
What parts of the six-paragraph Fine Article misapply the law? Be sure to quote and include the context surrounding the quoted section(s).
What are they going to do confiscate the world's gamer GPUs that can run this stuff all locally?
It's completely ridiculous.