Hacker News

Favorites Setup
Comment by milkshakes | original | All AI-generated code should be Open Source
[−]milkshakes · 2026-11-15 Sun 16:17 UTC · link
> This is a very clear agpl violation

clear in what way?

[−]AlienRobot · 2026-11-15 Sun 16:32 UTC · link
As clear as "can I take a copyrighted photo, use a photoshop filter on it, and then it's not copyrighted anymore?" is pretty clearly a solved question in any copyright system.
[−]adrianN · 2026-11-15 Sun 16:53 UTC · link
I think that this is actually a complex topic in copyright law that requires case by case analysis. It clearly is possible to cut out things from magazines, glue them together to form a collage and create a copyrighted work of art. In my naive opinion sufficient photoshop filtering can thus create a new copyrighted work.
[−]VonGuard · 2026-11-15 Sun 17:14 UTC · link
AGPL states that anything in-memory with AGPL code on a server is now subject to AGPL. Fairly clear to me. https://spdx.org/licenses/AGPL-3.0-or-later.html
[−]koolala · 2026-11-15 Sun 17:37 UTC · link
It doesn't say that. Your thinking of dynamically linked code. In-memory makes it sound like two programs loaded into the same stick of RAM.
[−]VonGuard · 2026-11-15 Sun 17:54 UTC · link
What's more dynamically linked than something unexpected the user requested, but it was brought forth upon demand?