Hacker News

Favorites Setup
Comment by doom2 | original | Court denies motion to dismiss DRAM price fixing case
[−]doom2 · 2026-11-15 Sun 14:31 UTC · link
> All 3 players have their entire inventory sold + reliable reports that their entire next year’s inventory sold.

If they had started building new fabs earlier, they might have been able to sell even more inventory _and_ gotten back into the consumer market that they now neglect. Instead they've been way too slow to respond to demand or, in this case, purposefully didn't respond to demand.

[−]gpt5 · 2026-11-15 Sun 14:33 UTC · link
But memory was dead cheap just a year ago. About 10 times cheaper. I don’t know if it’s reasonable to assume collusion here. It’s far more reasonable to assume they (and everybody else) didn’t anticipate the shortage.
[−]reenorap · 2026-11-15 Sun 14:49 UTC · link
No one anticipated that OpenAI would put in an order for 40% of the global supply of memory in 2025. And then it became a mad dash for everyone and that’s why we are where we are today.
[−]lokar · 2026-11-15 Sun 15:14 UTC · link
I really doubt that it was a surprise. The big cloud providers talk to suppliers (and potential suppliers) frequently to telegraph future demand, both the amount of parts and specs.

OAI would be doing the same.

[−]reenorap · 2026-11-15 Sun 15:55 UTC · link
No it was a huge surprise. I bought a 512 GB Mac Studio for $9k in April 2025 which was market. Even as recently as Jan 2026 I bought a 5070Ti for $750, the retail price. Now it’s $1500. No one anticipated the effects.
[−]lokar · 2026-11-15 Sun 17:10 UTC · link
I meant it was not a surprise to the ram manufacturers when demand shot up. Customers did not show up with massive orders out of nowhere.
[−]kasabali · 2026-11-15 Sun 16:16 UTC · link
[−]sophrosyne42 · 2026-11-15 Sun 16:39 UTC · link
Failing to forecast demand is not price fixing.