Then why were those apps allowed to run unsecured for so long that they gained enough users and their owners developed said fear about security fixes? Why do they have said fears in the first place? Maybe they don't trust your platform? You said you're company is committed to make security accessible - well, you failed big time. Yet you're unwilling to accept any blame and instead you're trying to shift blame to your users.
It's infuriating how little responsibility you are taking. And it's downright shameless of you to come here with this attitude and try to soothe the outrage with AI speak.
We are investing millions per year into free security tooling. There will be even more changes democratizing security coming out soon, with more features moving to Free/Pro tiers from higher tiers - watch our release announcements. Free and accessible is our core strategy for security features.
It's our way to act on the feedback, accept the blame, and find new ways to engage the users and help them fix their apps.
I think it's important to be here and engage in the discussion - to learn, share my point of view, and get back to work on securing every app on Lovable with more insights of struggles and issues of builders and the community.
It's infuriating how little responsibility you are taking. And it's downright shameless of you to come here with this attitude and try to soothe the outrage with AI speak.
To be fair, one can harbor a fear of updating after bad experiences with entirely unrelated software.