Hacker News

Favorites Setup
Comment by bamboozled | original | SpaceX catches the Starship to end Flight 15
[−]bamboozled · 2026-11-15 Sun 06:38 UTC · link
I thought the same, the catch was nice and impressive but I’d say it would be a fair bit of stress on the structure too. I’m guessing one day we will actually see these things have landing gears and not need a tower but until then…

I get similar vibes to watching this spectacle to that of the “Tesla flying car” demonstration. Amazing stunt , but is that the primary goal ?

[−]mrarson · 2026-11-15 Sun 07:09 UTC · link
Landing gear is really really heavy. To compare it to a building, the upper stage is 17 stories tall and 700sqft crosssection (9m⌀). The rocket is top-heavy, so you have to have wide legs. Wide legs need big triangular structures that articulate outwards, which dramatically increase the load (torque = force*distance) needed to hold up the 17 story building without breaking when it hits the ground, and are complex and get in the way of all the engines.

In comparison, adding more steel to the tower is effectively free. Additionally the hardpoints on the rocket are at the top (no top-heavy problem to deal with) and very close to the rocket, so the torque is minimal. And the hardpoints already exist, in the form of the attachments to the wings, which already need to be strong.

It is crazy but... it makes some amount of sense? I mean we'll see landing gear when/if it gets to the moon, but there's a lot less gravity there.

[−]bamboozled · 2026-11-15 Sun 13:14 UTC · link
I actually screwed up, I mean the rocket itself, not really the tower :) But yeah, agree the tower is probably the more robust piece and you're right, the legs would be heavy and I guess "dead weight".

I just find this reusable Starship thing pretty Elon, crazy impressive demo, actually a good concept, let's see if it truly goes "into prod".