Hacker News

Favorites Setup
Comment by w10-1 | original | California lawmakers unanimously pass Linux exemption from age-verification law
[−]w10-1 · 2026-08-30 Sun 08:25 UTC · link
> copy, redistribute, and modify the software

I can copy and redistribute macOS binaries, and I can write programs/extensions that modify macOS.

These vague terms show that legislators are incapable of regulating software effectively; but they do create an enduring legal franchise to deal with their confusion.

[−]SahAssar · 2026-08-30 Sun 08:56 UTC · link
You cannot. The apple license has multiple restrictions on that prevent you from copying, modifying and redistribution, for example:

> No Reverse Engineering. You may not, and you agree not to or enable others to, copy (except as expressly permitted by this License or by the Usage Rules if they are applicable to you), decompile, reverse engineer, disassemble, attempt to derive the source code of, decrypt, modify, or create derivative works of the Apple Software or any services provided by the Apple Software or any part thereof (except as and only to the extent any foregoing restriction is prohibited by applicable law or by licensing terms governing use of Open-Sourced Components that may be included with the Apple Software).

From https://www.apple.com/legal/sla/docs/macOSTahoe.pdf

[−]aniviacat · 2026-08-30 Sun 09:25 UTC · link
Aren't vague terms that need to be interpreted to mean what the writers intended very normal in the legal world?
[−]mirashii · 2026-08-30 Sun 11:56 UTC · link
> under license terms that permit a recipient to copy, redistribute, and modify the software

The “under license terms…” is a pretty important clause you omitted here.