Hacker News

Favorites Setup
Comment by petilon | original | Global review confirms mRNA vaccines are safe, effective and full of promise 
[−]petilon · 2026-07-02 Thu 01:31 UTC · link
Not many people know that Trump had a hand in starting the pandemic.

Here's what we know: In 2014, Obama administration halted the so called "gain of function" research because of risk of laboratory accidents. In 2017, the Trump administration restarted this dangerous research. See links below.

https://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/18/us/white-house-to-cut-fun...

Excerpt: [Obama administration] White House announced Friday that it would temporarily halt all new funding for experiments that seek to study certain infectious agents by making them more dangerous. The White House said the moratorium decision had been made “following recent biosafety incidents at federal research facilities.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/19/health/lethal-viruses-nih...

Excerpt: [Trump administration] on Tuesday ended a moratorium imposed three years ago on funding research that alters germs to make them more lethal. Critics say these researchers risk creating a monster germ that could escape the lab and seed a pandemic.

So, Trump restarted the dangerous research that Obama had shut down. You may be thinking, what does that have to do with Covid? Covid started in Wuhan, China, right?

It turns out that the Trump administration, through the National Institutes of Health (NIH), provided funding to the EcoHealth Alliance, an American non-profit organization focused on studying emerging diseases. The EcoHealth Alliance, in turn, provided funding to the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China for researching bat coronaviruses. The rest is history.

And then Trump also disbanded the pandemic preparedness team in 2018 just in time for the pandemic. See link below.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/nsc-pandemic-office-t...

[−]stinkbeetle · 2026-07-02 Thu 01:40 UTC · link
No that was a conspiracy theory fueled by Russian disinformation, the scientists and experts testified that there was no gain of function work being done and debunked it.
[−]petilon · 2026-07-02 Thu 01:47 UTC · link
Citation needed. If you are going to say NYT article is wrong we need more than just your words.
[−]stinkbeetle · 2026-07-02 Thu 02:08 UTC · link
You really believe some billionaire oligarchs propaganda corporation over foremost self-proclaimed expert Anthony "I am the science" Fauci? Something an agent of Putin would say.
[−]timr · 2026-07-02 Thu 01:41 UTC · link
Well, I have to say that this is the most innovative leap of partisan politics I’ve seen so far this year!

Most left-wing critics are still struggling with admitting that Anthony Fauci really did provide funding to EcoHealth, despite ample documentation.

[−]petilon · 2026-07-02 Thu 01:49 UTC · link
Not sure what is partisan about this. Some facts were presented. Not opinions, facts. If you dispute any of the above is factual please back up your assertion with citations.
[−]timr · 2026-07-02 Thu 01:59 UTC · link
The facts are true. Blaming Trump is the innovation.

For the record, I don’t care who gets blamed. I just think it’s a hilarious twist of partisan rhetoric.

[−]petilon · 2026-07-02 Thu 02:09 UTC · link
If the President hires someone who then restarted research that previous admin stopped for being too dangerous, does the President get no part of the blame? The buck stops with the President. If he hired the wrong person--and he has hired plenty of wrong people this time around--he gets the blame for the disasters they cause.
[−]stinkbeetle · 2026-07-02 Thu 06:43 UTC · link
This is great, speed running the meme.

1. There were no labs.

2. There was no gain of function research being funded.

3. The baseless lab leak conspiracy theory is hateful extreme far right Russian disinformation that is very dangerous to our democracy and it has already been debunked by the science and 72 intelligence agencies and CNN. Fauci is a Saint!

4. There was a lab leak and it's Trump's fault and you're still a dangerous conspiracy theorist for having previously questioned "the experts" integrity or the possibility of a lab leak.

[−]estearum · 2026-07-02 Thu 03:58 UTC · link
I haven't seen anyone at all dispute that NIH funded EcoHealth lol
[−]hackingonempty · 2026-07-02 Thu 03:59 UTC · link
> The EcoHealth Alliance, in turn, provided funding to the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China for researching bat coronaviruses. The rest is history.

The WIV is 20km from the Huanan market where the pandemic started. There is no direct evidence linking the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 to laboratory work conducted at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.[0] The evidence for zoonotic origin with multiple spillover events at the Huanan market is overwhelming.

This is just one review.

[0] https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annur...